Shows its work
Every deadline arrives with its evidence attached.
Some tools now scan your inbox too — but they still hand you a date without the local rule or the math, then trust that it’s right. CourtFlow reads the court’s email, applies your rule, and shows the arithmetic, so the question is never “do I trust the AI?” It’s “does this one-glance audit check out?” Four artifacts, on every deadline:
The document
The filing or order the deadline came from, linked from the deadline itself — filed in your own Drive, one click away.
The citation
The FRCP or state rule that produced the date, on the deadline row. Click it and the rules reference explains the rule.
The arithmetic
Trigger date, rule period, computed result — written out, e.g. “Served 4/28 by e-service + 30 days = 5/28.” Checkable in seconds.
The confidence tier
High, medium, low, or unverified. Anything ambiguous lands in the Verify queue for a human decision — flagged, never guessed.
Built for the second pair of eyes. Good docketing practice is two people checking every date — CourtFlow is designed to be checked, not believed. The rules library behind the citations is refreshed monthly from official sources, with a public change log.